Agency Operations

How to give competitor intelligence to a sales team without them ignoring it

Nobody in sales is reading your competitor wiki. They have four minutes before the call. Give them one line they can say out loud, and they will use it.

You wrote the competitor research. It is genuinely good. It sits in a shared doc that nobody has opened since the week it was announced.

This is not because your salespeople are lazy. It is because you built the wrong shape of thing.

What a rep's day actually looks like

Four minutes before a call. Three tabs open. Half a coffee. A calendar reminder that just went off. They are skimming the CRM notes and trying to remember whether this is the prospect with the weird procurement process.

That is the moment your competitive intelligence has to work in.

A six-page competitor profile does not survive that moment. It requires the rep to remember it exists, find it, open it, and read it, and each of those is a place where the whole thing quietly dies.

One line, not one page

The useful unit is a sentence a rep can say out loud.

Not a competitor profile. Not a feature matrix. A sentence.

When the prospect says they are also evaluating a specific rival, what does the rep say? That is the entire deliverable. It should be specific, true, checkable, and short enough to remember without reading.

Something like: their setup usually takes several weeks, and we have customers running the same day, and here is one who will tell you so.

That is usable. A paragraph explaining their market positioning is not usable, however correct it is.

Put it where they already are

Do not build a destination. Reps will not go to it.

Put the line in the CRM, on the deal, so it is on the screen they already have open. Or in the channel where the deal is being discussed. Or in the email that lands before the call.

The rule is simple: intelligence that requires a new habit will not be used. Intelligence that appears inside an existing habit will be.

The battlecard question

Battlecards are a real thing and they work in real sales organisations with a real person who owns competitive intelligence and keeps them current.

If that is you, build them.

If you are a five-person agency, be honest. You will build one battlecard in a burst of enthusiasm, it will be excellent, and it will be six months stale by autumn. And a stale battlecard is genuinely worse than none, because a rep will confidently say something about a competitor's pricing that stopped being true in the spring, and the prospect will correct them, and now you look like you do not know the market.

Small teams do not need battlecards. They need one current sentence, updated when something changes, delivered where the rep already looks.

That is a much smaller thing to build, and it is the one that actually gets used.

Frequently asked questions

Why does my sales team ignore the competitor research?
Because it is long and it is not where they are. A rep has minutes before a call and a document requires them to remember it exists, find it, and read it. That is three failures waiting to happen.
What format actually works?
One line per competitor, phrased as what to say. Not analysis, not a profile. The literal sentence a rep can use when the prospect says they are also looking at someone else.
Do we need battlecards?
If you have a real sales team and a real CI owner, maybe. If you are a five-person agency, a battlecard is an enterprise artefact you will build once and never update, and a stale battlecard is worse than none.
Elly
Founder, Earlist

Founder of Earlist. Writes about competitive intelligence for small agencies, founders, and freelancers.

← All articles