Competitive Intelligence

How competitor intelligence should change your product marketing

Stop inventing positioning in a workshop. Your competitors' repeated complaints, written by their own customers, are a positioning brief with evidence attached.

Most positioning is invented in a room. Four people, a whiteboard, and a strong feeling that the product is about empowerment.

It is invariably worse than the positioning that was sitting in your competitor's review page the entire time, written by strangers, for free.

The customer already wrote your copy

Go and read the one and two star reviews of your closest competitor. Find the complaint that appears again and again.

Read the exact words people use. Not the words your team would use. Theirs.

They will not say the onboarding experience lacks clarity. They will say something like: took three weeks to get anything working and I gave up twice.

That sentence is better than anything your workshop will produce, because it is specific, it is emotional, it is real, and it was written by the person you are trying to reach, about a problem they actually had.

Use their words. They already did the research and they did it better than you will.

Position against something checkable

The reason most competitive positioning fails is that it is not falsifiable, and buyers know it.

We are easier to use. Nobody believes this from anyone, because everybody says it, and it cannot be checked before purchase.

Compare that with: their users repeatedly report setup taking weeks, and ours takes an afternoon, and here is one who will tell you so.

That is checkable. The buyer can go verify it in five minutes, and the fact that you invited them to verify it is itself the persuasive part. Nobody invites scrutiny of a claim they are unsure about.

Specificity is not a stylistic preference. It is the mechanism.

Do not attack a strength

The most common mistake, and it is a costly one.

A competitor is genuinely excellent at something. Everyone knows it, including your prospects. And you decide to position against it anyway, because it is the most prominent thing about them.

You lose. You look either dishonest or uninformed, and both are worse than saying nothing. The prospect has used their product. They know it works.

Position against the thing their own customers complain about. Not the thing you wish were a weakness.

Watch their language, not just their features

Here is the signal almost nobody in product marketing tracks.

When a competitor changes how they describe themselves, they changed who they are selling to. The homepage headline, the ad copy, the words in the meta description. These do not change casually, they change because someone made a decision.

If their new language describes your buyer, in your words, addressing your use case, then they are coming for your segment. That was decided in a room last quarter and it is now visible to anyone who bothers to look.

That is worth more than any feature announcement, and it arrives earlier, and it is free.

Frequently asked questions

How do I find my positioning from competitor data?
Read their repeated one-star complaints and find the one you genuinely do not have. That is a claim that is specific, differentiated, and verifiable by a stranger, which is more than most positioning workshops produce.
Should I name competitors in my marketing?
Sometimes, and it works better than people expect for technical audiences who are already comparing. It works badly when it reads as an attack. State facts, let the reader decide, do not perform outrage.
What does it mean if a competitor changes their homepage headline?
They changed who they are talking to. Language is downstream of strategy. If their new words describe your buyer, they are coming for your segment and you have a quarter to respond.
Elly
Founder, Earlist

Founder of Earlist. Writes about competitive intelligence for small agencies, founders, and freelancers.

← All articles